(hey, type here for great stuff)

access to tools for the beginning of infinity

T-Fold wooden home blends design & disaster-proof tech

After the 2009 earthquake in Central Italy left 40,000 people homeless, Nico D’Incecco and the team at A-Fold began thinking of how they could help provide quickly deployable shelters. In 2019, they released a house that unfolds in hours and provides anti-seismic security. The wooden houses are prefabricated, loaded onto trucks for transport and unfolded on site in hours (adding the windows, drywall and interior finishings takes about two weeks).

The first design was the Model A (an A-frame), but the company soon released the Model-T (for “trapezoid”) to gain more space on the second floor. There is no need for a concrete foundation since the homes can be placed on screw piles. The homes begin around 51 (550 square feet) and can grow depending on how many modules one purchases. The only limitation is the modules need to be placed in line, so the company suggests stopping at the “villa” size of 127 square meters (1367 square feet). The units are prefabbed with a selection of cladding, roofing and flooring.

The homes can also be folded back up and moved, as easily as they unfold, making it possible to reuse them at a new location. The hinge system construction also provides flexibility in the home during an earthquake, allowing it to “disperse the energy of earth tremors” and weather seismic phenomena.

  • Corxel

    A complete lie. These homes are NOT tornado proof at all. A powerful tornado would completely destroy these types of buildings

    • So, in your opinion, the fact the structure keeps connected through massive hinges doesn’t have anything to do with performance against extreme-weather. An analogy: earthquake-proof buildings don’t stand brutal earthquakes but hold fine with most quakes. Are those technologies in, say, Japan or San Francisco, “a complete lie”?

      • Corxel

        WRONG ID10T. Based on inability of the vertical walls to withstand 230 PSF

        • Right. I think my first answer made the point that needed to be made. Pseudo-technical wording does not make things more credible.

  • suzanne

    I find it interesting. I could totally live in a home like that one.